A bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde additionally issued notices to the Nationwide Well being Authority. (File)
New Delhi:
The Supreme Courtroom has sought responses from the Centre and others on a plea which has sought to declare as “unlawful” and “unconstitutional” the actions of states, together with Delhi and West Bengal, in not implementing “Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana.”
In addition to the Centre, a bench headed by Chief Justice SA Bobde additionally issued notices to the Nationwide Well being Authority (NHA), Telangana, West Bengal, Odisha and Delhi looking for their replies on the plea which has additionally sought a route for implementing the scheme for poor and center class individuals in these states.
NHA is the highest physique answerable for implementing “Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana”, the flagship public medical health insurance assurance scheme of the Central authorities.
“Problem discover returnable in two weeks,” mentioned the bench, additionally comprising Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.
The courtroom was listening to a plea filed by Hyderabad-based Perala Shekhar Rao who has sought route to the authority involved to organize a scheme for offering the choice to individuals of those states to both avail Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana or the insurance coverage scheme applied by the respective states.
The petition, drafted by advocate Sravan Kumar, mentioned that the Centre has been implementing the medical health insurance scheme for 50 crore individuals of the nation with an annual price range of Rs 6,400 crore and below this scheme, poor individuals are entitled to avail therapy for varied well being issues together with testing and therapy for COVID-19.
It alleged that besides Telangana, Delhi, West Bengal and Odisha, all of the states within the nation are implementing or availing the Ayushman Bharat scheme.
“This has resulted the denial of medical health insurance profit supplied by Union of India to the individuals of 4 states which is opposite to Article 14 (equality earlier than legislation) and 21 (safety of life and private liberty) of the Structure,” it claimed.
“It’s submitted that each one the states within the nation no matter political events are using the Central authorities well being scheme to profit the individuals however besides the states equivalent to Telangana, Delhi, Odisha and West Bengal will not be utilizing the well-crafted common well being scheme by the Union of India,” it mentioned.
It mentioned that as a result of non-availability of medical health insurance and lack of correct services in authorities hospitals, poor and center class individuals are pressured to pay enormous cash for therapy of COVID-19 at personal hospitals.
The plea mentioned {that a} complete scheme could also be framed by the Centre and Nationwide Well being Authority to supply Ayushman Bharat scheme for needing and eligible individuals and people could also be given the choice to avail both this scheme or the native well being schemes run by state governments.
Referring to final yr knowledge, it mentioned that over 16,000 hospitals, together with round 8,050 personal hospitals, have been empanelled below the Ayushman Bharat scheme throughout the nation and the authority has additionally fastened the charges for about 1,500 therapy procedures contemplating the bills required for therapy and hospitalisation.
(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is printed from a syndicated feed.)
