Sen. Ted Cruz: We Are One Vote Away From Losing Our Fundamental Liberties

Republicans throughout the Senate and President Trump rightly are taking movement to fill Justice Ginsburg’s vacancy on the courtroom — quite a bit to the consternation of Democrats, who’ve been all for filling a Supreme Courtroom vacancy when Justice Antonin Scalia handed away in February 2016. On the time, the Republican Senate appropriately decided to look at a historic precedent and by no means confirm then-President Barack Obama’s Supreme Courtroom nominee, Merrick Garland, in an election 12 months.

Historically, when the president and the Senate are of the equivalent political social gathering, the president nominates and the Senate confirms Supreme Courtroom justices in election years. When the president and the Senate shouldn’t of the equivalent political social gathering, the Senate hasn’t typically taken up the president’s Supreme Courtroom nomination in an election 12 months.

Republicans adopted historic precedent in 2016 by declining to confirm Merrick Garland to the Supreme Courtroom, and Republicans are likewise following historic precedent now by taking over President Trump’s Supreme Courtroom nomination.

Extra, in 2014 the American people voted for a Republican Senate to be a legislative confirm on the Obama-Biden administration. They felt the nation was shifting too far to the left, considerably the federal judiciary. The Senate’s operate is to advise and consent on the president’s nominations. By not confirming Merrick Garland to the Supreme Courtroom, we’ve been doing the job the American people mandated us to do.

With the Supreme Courtroom vacancy on the street, the 2016 election turned partially a referendum on the type of nominee that must substitute Justice Scalia. The vacancy turned one of the important issues throughout the 2016 presidential advertising marketing campaign. For lots of Folks, myself included, it was the one most crucial goal we voted for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton.

As I lay out in my new e e book, “One Vote Away — How a Single Supreme Courtroom Seat Can Change Historic previous,” I agreed to endorse then-candidate Trump solely when he agreed to a specified guidelines of people he would take into consideration nominating to be Justice Scalia’s various. He agreed to the guidelines, and two weeks into his presidency President Trump nominated one among many 21 judges on the guidelines, Select Neil Gorsuch, to fill Justice Scalia’s seat.

The reason American voters picked Trump over Clinton, and the rationale they ushered in a Senate majority in 2014 and 2016 and expanded that majority in 2018, is on account of the constitutional liberties elementary to our democracy — free speech, religious liberty and the Second Modification — maintain throughout the stability of the courtroom.

In my e e book, I make the case for why filling the vacancy left by Justice Ginsburg is so crucial. On so many factors, we’re just one vote away from dropping our liberties — akin to spiritual liberty and our correct to keep up and bear arms — and seeing our nation basically modified.

I examine eight important constitutional factors and landmark Supreme Courtroom cases that every American must study, akin to Van Orden v. Perry, a landmark religious liberty case, District of Columbia v. Heller, which affirmed our Second Modification correct to keep up and bear arms, and Gonzales v. Carhart, the place the Supreme Courtroom upheld the federal ban on the grotesque comply with of partial-birth abortion. Plenty of the cases I write about throughout the e e book have been decided by just one vote. Almost all of them I helped litigate, and I purpose to make clear what truly happens on the Supreme Courtroom when our constitutional rights are at stake.

And in a matter of weeks, the outcomes of this presidential election could come proper all the way down to the courtroom. If the election outcomes are challenged, a four-four courtroom can’t decide one thing. We might like a full Courtroom on Election Day, given the extreme chance we’ll see litigation that goes to the courtroom. We might like a 9 justice Supreme Courtroom that may present a definitive reply for the nation.

Within the case of our elementary rights and contentious protection factors, we’re one vote away from each upholding the Construction and preserving our liberties or destroying them.
For ourselves and for posterity, we’ve now a solemn obligation to not let that happen.

Source link