Chrystia Freeland has the blueprint to revolutionize Canadian banking — so let’s use it

Article content

Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland has in her possession a blueprint that could revolutionize financial services.

Earlier this spring, Freeland received recommendations from a group of Bay Street operatives handpicked by the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government to consider whether Canada should follow the lead of countries such as the United Kingdom and Australia and allow consumers to control their financial data.

The policy is known as “open banking” and it could provide a competitive shock to a banking system whose idea of competition is engaging in price wars over the issuance of government-backed mortgages. The review has been so slow in coming to what many say are foregone conclusions that some have wondered if the big banks are doing their best to stand in the way of progress. Whatever the reason for the slow going, any delay from this point on will have everything to do with Freeland herself, as she now has all the information and context that she needs.

Article content

“From what I understand, the advisory committee, made up of some very sharp people, have delivered their report to the minister and it’s with the minister, but that is a black that I can’t see into,” said Dan Dickinson, chief information officer at Equitable Bank, Canada’s ninth-biggest lender, which runs a digital-only deposit-taking platform.

Dickinson’s comments are significant because it was unclear whether the review was progressing or if it had been waylaid by the pandemic. A new round of consultations was postponed a year ago, as the COVID-19 crisis crowded out other priorities.

“We’re in the camp of believing it’s going to come, but it’s probably going to happen more slowly than we would like it to happen,” Michael Katchen, founder and chief executive of Wealthsimple Technologies Inc., told the Financial Post’s Stefanie Marotta last month. “So we’re building our business the way we ought to build it, with the tools we have today. But we would love to see open banking come to Canada and we think it would be a wonderful thing for the industry.”

In the autumn of 2018, Freeland’s predecessor, Bill Morneau, created the Advisory Committee on Open Banking: Colleen Johnston, a former executive at Toronto-Dominion Bank; François Lafortune, a Montreal-based entrepreneur and investor; Kirsten Thompson, a Toronto-based lawyer at Dentons Canada LLP; and Ilse Treurnicht, the former head of the MaRS Discovery District, which houses various upstart technology companies in downtown Toronto.

Article content

Their mission was to review the “merits” of open banking, the somewhat vague term used to describe a regulatory regime that would give consumers control over their financial information, as opposed to their banks. Financial startups say open banking is essential, as it would level the playing field on which they’d like to challenge legacy institutions such as Royal Bank of Canada and Toronto-Dominion.

Morneau seemed to like the idea, saying in the 2018 announcement that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government wanted a financial system that “promotes competition and consumer choice.” For all its strengths, Canada’s banking oligopoly isn’t known for promoting either of those things aggressively. The legacy banks have attempted to dull enthusiasm for open banking over the years, arguing that a hasty embrace of such a regime could threaten privacy and expose financial institutions to cyberattacks.

The big banks appear to have had some success slowing down the process. Freeland’s office declined to state explicitly that the minister has received the report.

“As the financial sector is becoming increasingly digitized, and to ensure the privacy and security of Canadians, the government is reviewing consumer-driven finance, or open banking, in Canada,” Katherine Cuplinskas, the finance minister’s press secretary, said in an email. “An advisory committee on open banking has been appointed to conduct this review and to provide advice on potential solutions and standards to enhance data protection in the financial sector. The advisory committee’s report will be released in due course.”

Article content

Regardless, there is a sense among advocates such as Dickinson that things are finally moving, even in Ottawa, despite the Trudeau government’s obfuscation.

“It does feel like there is some enthusiasm around this,” Dickinson said during an event at Payments Canada’s annual conference last week. “It stalled, to be honest, this time last year, and it didn’t feel like it was moving much. Obviously, the government had bigger things to be worrying about at the time.”

But the advisory committee did manage to hold some discussions last year, and it conducted another round of consultations earlier this year, Dickinson said. “I get the sense that the conversations that continue are promising,” he said. “The general consensus does seem to be that this would be a good thing to do. There are a lot of public policy objectives that I think it could help support. The ‘How?’ is a bit of the tricky part, and the ‘Who?’ a little bit.”

Answering ‘How?’ will involve the provinces, who no doubt will want a say on who runs whatever system emerges. All the more reason for Freeland to release the report so the next phase can begin. The delay is impeding Canada’s ability to compete in the digital economy, at least on the margin.

“It’s slowed us down in getting to the promised land, which is this future state where money works as it should — it’s seamless, it’s fast, it’s transparent, people have the choice to move between institutions without having to pay ridiculous fees, and wait ridiculous time periods,” Katchen said. “All of that is slowed down today, and open banking would help accelerate it.”

• Email: | Twitter: CarmichaelKevin